Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 03/09/2010 12:53 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > On 05.03.2010 17:31, Alexander Kurtakov wrote:
> > > Time to bring GCJ support discussion back.
> > > We should find a way to not install java-1.5.0-gcj on every
> > > users computers. There are packages that do not work with it
> > > and it's plain wrong to install it as a dependency of this
> > > packages which are explicitly requiring java 1.6.0.
> > > Possible solutions:
> > > * Solution 1 - someone who cares for the gcj stack finds a way
> > > to not require java-1.5.0-gcj when there are gcj bits in the
> > > package so we do not force gcj installation on every user.
>
> That shouldn't be too difficult. I'm looking at jakarta-oro now: I
> removed the
>
> --- jakarta-oro.spec~ 2009-07-26 13:52:21.000000000 +0100
> +++ jakarta-oro.spec 2010-03-09 13:24:34.445414981 +0000
> @@ -59,8 +59,6 @@
>
> %if %{gcj_support}
> BuildRequires: java-gcj-compat-devel
> -Requires(post): java-gcj-compat
> -Requires(postun): java-gcj-compat
> %endif
>
> %description
>
> and it's fine. There's no need AFAICS for a Requires: on java-gcj-compat.
If it uses rebuild-gcj-db in its %post and %postun scripts then it
needs those dependencies. You would perhaps be better off undefining
gcj_support but leaving them in place.
Cheers,
Gary
--
http://gbenson.net/
--
java-devel mailing list
java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel
