Re: Update on Soprano/Sesame progress -- review swaps?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/07/2010 06:00 AM, Mary Ellen Foster wrote:
> For anyone who's still interested in my project to get the Sesame
> backend for Sesame packaged, here's the latest...
> 
> Unfortunately, I didn't get anything done over the holidays, but I'm
> now back and keen to move forwards on this. All of the required
> updates to existing Fedora packages have now been made, so the "only"
> thing left to do is the reviews of the new packages.
> 
> The document at
> https://fedoraproject.org/w/uploads/c/c9/Sesame-Dependencies.pdf shows
> the current state of the package dependencies. In summary, the most
> urgent review at the moment is javamail and then, once that's done,
> logback, because the whole chain of aduna-* packages all depend
> (directly or indirectly) on logback. xml-security is another
> "leaf-node" package that could be done at any time, but it's not
> actually needed until all of the other stuff has been processed so
> it's less urgent.
> 
> I'm willing to review any packages, particularly Java-based packages,
> in return for anyone who can review these packages. Once it gets to
> the aduna-* packages, the spec files are all nearly identical so
> hopefully they can be processed fairly efficiently.
> 

I'm happy to review a package or 2 in exchange for jai-imageio-core:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536944


Adam

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

--
fedora-devel-java-list mailing list
fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list

[Index of Archives]     [Red Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux