Hi Gerry, On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 15:21 -0500, greno@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > And in doing some more searching it appears that this deficiency in > rhino was due to some license issue that openjdk6 did not like so some > code was removed. If I understand correctly that license problem has > been addressed (at least from rhino perspective). So what would be > good is if there could be an update to all openjdk6 that would > incorporate the complete rhino code so javascript would fully work. Indeed there is no legal issue anymore. And IcedTea/OpenJDK now include (pick up the system installed) rhino to support javascript. I am not sure how the tests that you say fail are exactly failing. Do you have some more logs? Might you be bitten by this issue? http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179 "javascript script support through rhino should not be on bootclasspath" If the issue above comes from using a non-system installed rhino, then there is a workaround mentioned in the comments of that bug report that might work for you. But if so, it would also be good to make your package work against the installed rhino on your fedora system. Cheers, Mark -- fedora-devel-java-list mailing list fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list
