2009/10/13 Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn@xxxxxxxxxx>: > On 13/10/09 02:26 PM, Mat Booth wrote: >> >> There is indeed, I packaged lpg because it was also an eclipse-dtp >> dependency. Presumably you need the same version that is orbit (lpg >> 1.1), so you'll want to require lpg-java-compat rather than lpg-java. >> > > Thanks for the info. > >> Unfortunately that version of lpg (version 1.1) is no longer >> maintained upstream; what are the chances of getting CDT upstream to >> migrate to the newer and more actively maintained lpg 2.0? >> > > I would imagine good if it is just plugging in 2.0 and everything works. > I can try it after I get 1.1 working. If 2.0 requires patches, it may > require some discussion to get them to upgrade. > > -- Jeff J. > Well the jar name and the package names have changed, so there will be a non-zero amount of patching needed. I can't comment on API changes however. -- Mat Booth A: Because it destroys the order of the conversation. Q: Why shouldn't you do it? A: Posting your reply above the original message. Q: What is top-posting? -- fedora-devel-java-list mailing list fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list
