Re: Suggestions to improve the JAVA guidelines

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

It seems one interesting question about Java guidelines has no answer yet...

Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Conrad Meyer wrote:
Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
JAVA GUIDELINES:

- BuildRequires: jpackage-utils

Why do we need this? I understand Requires: jpackage-utils for directory ownership etc, but the BR is not necessary for most packages (at least all the ones I saw so far). I think this should *not* be required.
rpm -ql jpackage-utils | grep /usr/bin
A lot of these are useful.
Yes, I agree. But can't we leave the BR out for those packages which don't use these tools?
AFAIK minimization of dependencies between components is an important development target of any system. Establishing of the superfluous dependencies is not a good development approach even if we'll add a dependency on a component that is very useful in all other cases.

The jemmy package [1] is an example where dependencies on the jpackage-utils are redundant.

Are there any valuable reasons for establishing dependencies on the jpackage-utils if such facilities are not used in a package/subpackage?

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514699

Thanks in advance,
Victor

--
fedora-devel-java-list mailing list
fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list

[Index of Archives]     [Red Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux