Andrew John Hughes wrote: > On 10:33 Wed 08 Jul , Andrew Haley wrote: >> Mario Torre wrote: >>> Il 05/07/2009 07:00, Otto Rey ha scritto: >>>> HI people... >>>> >>>> I want to propose to update java-gnome to version 4.0.11 (currently we >>>> are offering 2.12.4 via yum) >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks >>> I think that some people still needs the old version as well, but I >>> wonder why we don't ship both, as far as I know it's possible and Andrew >>> and his team are doing a very good job with java gnome, it should be >>> ready for prime time now :) >> What's the backwards compatibility story with java-gnome? Did thgy >> manage not to break the API going forward? >> >> -- >> fedora-devel-java-list mailing list >> fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list > > AIUI, it's a complete redesign: > > http://blogs.operationaldynamics.com/andrew/conferences/india/foss.in-2006-pastpresentfuture-java-gnome.html Hmm, I wonder if they had the good sense to maintain the old API, along the lines of java.nio after java.io. Andrew. -- fedora-devel-java-list mailing list fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list
