Stepan Kasal wrote: > Hallo, Hi. > On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 11:12:30AM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote: >> Stepan Kasal wrote: >>> the differences between the two java's (e.g. that jni.h is installed >>> to the default include path by gcj but not by openjdk, different >>> javadocs) make the good old generic >>> BuildRequires: java-devel >>> very problematic, so I had to change it to >>> BuildRequires: java-1.5.0-gcj-devel >>> >>> Well, my package builds fine with gcj and my conscience is clear as I >>> have reported this, so all is fine. :-) >> Sure, but it would make much more sense to look for jni.h in the right >> place: then it would build with either. I would like to move jni.h out >> of the compiler's default include path, but then God only knows what >> else would break. > > well http://bugzilla.redhat.com/498964#c1 seems to recommend > for i in -I/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0/include{,/linux}; do > java_inc="$java_inc $i" > done > %configure CPPFLAGS="$java_inc" > > But I'm afraid that this might not work with gcj or java-1.7.0-opejdk > (if it existed). That's wrong. Use "-I/usr/lib/jvm/java/include/" Symlinks work like this: /usr/lib/jvm/java --> /etc/alternatives/java_sdk --> /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk.x86_64 --> /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0.x86_64 or, if gcj is installed instead, /usr/lib/jvm/java --> /etc/alternatives/java_sdk --> /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-gcj --> /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-gcj-1.5.0.0 Andrew. -- fedora-devel-java-list mailing list fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list
