Hi, On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 13:54 +0100, Alexander Kurtakov wrote: > Mat Booth wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Andrew Overholt <overholt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >>> Seeing the page made me think that the Fedora Eclipse comps group [2] > >>> is terribly outdated. Should we be adding our plugins to this group? > >>> > >> Yeah, we should update it. Let's discuss potential patches here. > > > > We should at least include all the IDE plugins in the "Fedora Eclipse" > > group as optionals to make them 'discoverable,' as it were: > > > > eclipse-birt > > eclipse-dtp > > > I don't like the idea of putting birt and dtp until they are fully > builded. Agreed. Hopefully that'll be soon :) > > eclipse-egit > > eclipse-epic > > eclipse-photran > > eclipse-phpeclipse > > eclipse-quickrex > > eclipse-shelled > > eclipse-slide > > > To the previous I would add: > eclipse-cmake > eclipse-moreunit > eclipse-rpmstubby Sounds good. I *think* I have commit access to the comps module so if someone wants to send a patch, I can try committing. Andrew -- fedora-devel-java-list mailing list fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list
