Re: Including classes from Sun's demo code in a Fedora package

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 11:41 +0100, Mary Ellen Foster wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Mark Wielaard <mark@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > That ElementTreePanel.java is in the demo package, but hidden inside a
> > zip file:
> > /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0.*/demo/jfc/Notepad/src.zip
> >
> > It comes under a modern BSD-license (without nuclear clause, hurray!)
> > But ExampleFileFilter.java indeed isn't part of the package
> > unfortunately.
> 
> Oh. That's cool! So what should the package submitter do, then? If he
> just copies the new ExampleTreePanel into the source of his package
> replacing the included one, is that kosher?

Yes, and note the change in license, since not all the code is GPLed.

-- 
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet@xxxxxxxxx>

PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

--
fedora-devel-java-list mailing list
fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list

[Index of Archives]     [Red Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux