On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 17:16 +0100, Mary Ellen Foster wrote: > 2009/2/9 Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet@xxxxxxxxx>: > > On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 13:53 +0100, Mary Ellen Foster wrote: > >> Is this a showstopper for the package in question? Both of the Sun > >> demo files are BSD-licensed, while simplyhtml is GPL, if that's > >> relevant ... > > > > Do they have the notorious "no nukes" clause? > > Ooh, good thought -- unfortunately, yes, looks like they do. Guess the > only option is to patch the application not to use these classes, > right? :( Three options: remove, relicense, replace. -- Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet@xxxxxxxxx> PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-java-list mailing list fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list
