Hi,
* Orion Poplawski <orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2008-08-28 16:18]:
> Andrew Overholt wrote:
>>
>> * Orion Poplawski <orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2008-08-28 14:09]:
>>> for feature in org.eclipse.photran_feature org.eclipse.photran.intel \
>>> org.eclipse.photran.vpg_feature
>>> org.eclipse.photran.xlf_feature
>>
>> We usually try to match features to binary RPMs.
>>
>>> Now the issue seems to be how/where to install. Each of the zip
>>> files created starts with the directory "eclipse/" and 3 contain
>>> "eclipse/contents.xml" files (which are different) so I don't think
>>> they should unzip into the same directory. What makes sense?
>>
>> If you want them to all be in the same binary RPM, just unzip them all
>> there and remove the content.xml. content.xml is just for speeding up
>> the first startup after this plugin is installed and isn't strictly
>> necessary.
>
> I'm not sure if any of the other features are useful independent of each
> other or if you ever would want "photran_feature" without
> "photran.vpg_feature". I've asked upstream.
Okay. Just dump them in the same place if you don't want separation.
> %{eclipse_base}/dropins/photran/eclipse/features/
>
> Should I remove the second "eclipse" or not bother?
Yeah, remove it. It'll work, but it's better without it. Some time
soon (before F10) I am going to go through all of the plugins we have in
Fedora and fix this.
Andrew
--
fedora-devel-java-list mailing list
fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list
