* Mary Ellen Foster <foster@xxxxxxxxx> [2008-08-13 10:18]: > In Fedora at the moment, there's an "asm2" package > (asm2-2.2.3-2jpp.1.fc9.noarch). ASM was actually upgraded to version 3 > quite a while ago (see http://asm.objectweb.org/), and the current > version is 3.1. A package I'd like to submit to Fedora appears to > (indirectly) depend on asm version 3. I'm wondering how to proceed ... > why is the current package called "asm2" rather than just "asm"? Does > this mean we need an "asm3" package now too, or is it possible to just > create an "asm" package with the correct versioning. > > I've made a first stab at creating an "asm3" package based on the > current asm2 one; it can be seen here: > http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/asm3/ > How should I proceed from here? > I was about to do the same a while ago (upgrade to 3) but then found out that it is already in Fedora.. just uses a different name: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=5418 Cheers, Deepak > Thanks, > > MEF > > -- > Mary Ellen Foster -- http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/mef/ > Informatik 6: Robotics and Embedded Systems, Technische Universität München > and ICCS, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh > > -- > fedora-devel-java-list mailing list > fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list -- fedora-devel-java-list mailing list fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list
