On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 15:02 -0430, Robert Marcano wrote: > On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 15:07 -0400, Andrew Overholt wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've finally got version 3.4 of the Eclipse SDK ready to go, targetting > > Fedora 10: > > > > Good news, looks like the Subversive plugin still is not part of the > base platform like CVS, I am maintaining the subclipse package but it > had not much activity recently. ummmm maybe I should try it. ooop my mistake , subclipse is at 1.4.3 and I have packaged 1.2.4, the last time I checked it was at 1.4.2, (and 1.2.4 != 1.4.2 I need glasses) > > is someone working on packaging another Ganymede subprojects? just > yesterday I had to install as a requirement for m2eclipse (Maven > integration plugins needed to work with JBoss EJB3 sources from > eclipse), and I do not like any non OS updater :-). I remember that EMF > was previously packaged > > > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=58121 > > > > (See [1] for an in-progress build with some minor fixes.) > > > > Action item for plugin package maintainers: > > ------------------------------------------- > > Please look at the relevant attached patches and apply them or something > > like them in the devel directory of your plugin(s). Feel free to commit > > and tag but note that you won't be able to build until I tag the build > > for rawhide. > > > > Email me personally if you have questions. Please also let me know when > > you're finished and I can do koji builds of everything in the right > > order (chain-build or otherwise). I'd like to do this very soon so > > please take a few minutes to apply the changes. > > > > Testing of the above build is greatly appreciated. > > ------------------------------------------- > > > > There are a few minor changes for packagers of plugins/features: > > > > - Bits are now installed to %{_libdir}/eclipse instead of > > %{_datadir}/eclipse. This brings us in line with upstream's file layout > > and avoids the crazy split-install osgi.sharedConfiguration.area hack. > > It's also what Debian does, FWIW. > > > > - p2 is the new provisioning platform in 3.4. Essentially it replaces the > > old update manager but does other things as well. It requires > > Eclipse-based apps to use profiles -- like Mozilla profiles -- and manage > > them using its "director". In order to avoid fragile %post scriptlets, > > we're going to use the "dropins mechanism" for plugin installation. This > > means that all non-Eclipse platform plugins will be installed into their > > own directory under %{_libdir}/eclipse/dropins. There are a variety of > > layouts that are acceptable to p2, but we'll largely be going with > > dropins/eclipse/<short name>/{plugins,features}. This has the nice side > > benefit of simplifying %files sections :) . See [2] for more > > information here. > > > > - I added a flag to the pdebuild script to allow for Orbit-style > > dependencies. If you don't know what this means, that's okay, but if > > a plugin you want to package uses Orbit dependencies, you'll want to > > use the -o flag to pdebuild. Plugins that use non-Eclipse JARs but > > don't have a lib directory with JARs are probably using Orbit-style > > dependencies. They'll have Require-Bundle or Import-Package entries > > in their plugin MANIFEST.MFs. See eclipse-mylyn for an example of how > > to use pdebuild in this case. > > > > - I've renamed (and Obsoleted/Provided) libswt3-gtk2 to eclipse-swt. I > > can't count the number of times people have been confused by this > > naming and since we're not going to ship swt2 or swt.motif any time > > soon, the naming is silly. I also folded pde-runtime into pde since > > PHPEclipse no longer needs the separate pde-runtime package. > > > > Outside of the CDT and the SELinux tools (both maintainers are working on > > the necessary changes themselves), I've got patches for all of the plugins > > we have as packages in Fedora. I've attached these patches and CC'd all of > > the maintainers. > > > > I will update the packaging guidelines very soon with the above > > information. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Andrew > > > > [1] > > Build with branding fixed and removing some unnecessary Requires(post) > > and the pde-runtime package which is now folded into pde: > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=750696 > > > > [2] > > There are some performance considerations here. Since it's generating > > the associated metadata and "provisioning" the bits on the fly based on > > files dropped into a directory, users may notice a slightly longer > > startup the first time they start the Eclipse IDE after installing a new > > plugin package. Subsequent startups won't be impacted. There is a lot > > of performance improvement work going on upstream and much of it will > > land in 3.4.1. If 3.4.1 is released early enough, we'll ship it in > > Fedora 10. If not, we can ship it as an update. Should testing between > > now and Fedora 10 show unacceptably poor performance (I haven't noticed > > this in my own testing), we can look at back-porting some of the > > performance work. The other main way of speeding up dropins-installed > > plugins is by shipping pre-generated p2 metadata (like yum metadata). > > I've experimented with this and think I can make it so that we > > transparently generate it via pdebuild meaning it would only require a > > rebuild of Fedora plugin packages. Things will work without these > > generated content.xml files so in the interest of getting testing sooner > > rather than later, I'm going to push ahead without the metadata for > > dropins. > > -- > fedora-devel-java-list mailing list > fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list -- fedora-devel-java-list mailing list fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list