Andrew Overholt wrote: > * Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> [2008-06-27 15:17]: >> Le vendredi 27 juin 2008 à 14:14 -0400, Andrew Overholt a écrit : >> >>> Does anyone have any thoughts on this? >> I'd rather you worked with Fernando Nasser and the other guys in >> Fedora's java place on common jar deployment rules, instead of >> reinventing the private app root dead-end that makes sharing resources >> next to impossible and encourages library forking and duplication > > The JARs are 99% application-specific so putting them into a > subdirectory makes sense to me and follows the guidelines we have in > place. We have no library forking or duplication of the dependent JARs, > either. I agree. Eclipse's deployment problems are somewhat unusual. Debian's solution looks like a practical way to solve these problems. Andrew. -- fedora-devel-java-list mailing list fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list
