Re: Fedora java packaging, icedtea vs gcj

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Il giorno mar, 27/11/2007 alle 10.35 +0000, Andrew Haley ha scritto:

> OK, that's fair, but it's going to be *really* easy to let things in
> Classpath slide.  I am going to keep on top of this: apart from ppc
> issues, there are also the secondary architectures ARM, IA-64, and
> SPARC.  I'd like to keep gcj going in good shape until we have a
> reasonable portability story for OpenJDK.
> 
> Andrew.

+1 if that matter

Mario
-- 
Lima Software - http://www.limasoftware.net/
GNU Classpath Developer - http://www.classpath.org/
Fedora Ambassador - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MarioTorre
Jabber: neugens@xxxxxxxxxx
pgp key: http://subkeys.pgp.net/ PGP Key ID: 80F240CF
Fingerprint: BA39 9666 94EC 8B73 27FA  FC7C 4086 63E3 80F2 40CF

Please, support open standards:
http://opendocumentfellowship.org/petition/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Questa =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E8?= una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente

--
fedora-devel-java-list mailing list
fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list

[Index of Archives]     [Red Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux