* Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx> [2007-10-15 09:03]: > On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 08:11:40AM -0400, Andrew Overholt wrote: > > * David Walluck <david@xxxxxxxx> [2007-10-15 07:29]: > > > Also, jpackage-utils should be required by the eclipse package regardless. > > > > Why? Some of its dependencies Require it so it'll be brought in. Is > > there an advantage to requiring it explicitly? > > The dependency chain is not obvious to me, it seems to be through > java-1.5.0-gcj. If I am not wrong, it seems to me that a direct Requires > would be better. I really don't care, so if people want to see that explicit Requires, feel free to add it to the package in CVS or send me a patch. Andrew
Attachment:
pgp4ljXKoy2Lg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-java-list mailing list fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list
