On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 13:55 -0700, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: > On 7/23/07, Andrew Overholt wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 11:24 -0700, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: > > > --on dev machines, updating eclipse (though we just started using the > > > Jpackage'd RHEL4 SDK channel which seems pretty stable) > > > > I'm interested in more details here if you can provide them. > > Sure, not sure if you mean on the problem side or the RHEL SDK side. > If you've used Eclipse, the problem should be pretty clear. There is an > update manager, but it's slow and half the time it crashes if you've got > a bunch of plugins (and we do). It's usually faster to download an > entire new Eclipse bundle than use the updater. Okay, that's an upstream problem that's being addressed in 3.4. > The RHEL4 SDK has most of what we normally use, which is > Eclipse + WTP / Tomcat 5.5 (for J2EE) + Subclipse. It installs with > up2date or yum and works. It's the same trade-off as usual for RHEL, > it's not the latest features but it's stable. Users can install Europa in > their home directory if desired. What's the "RHEL4 SDK" you speak of? RHDS? I didn't think JPackage provided any Eclipse packages other than ecj anymore. Andrew
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-java-list mailing list fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list
