On Tue, 2007-17-04 at 14:41 -0400, David Walluck wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Andrew Overholt wrote: > > Do you have any specific cases of this? Note that plugins themselves > > require no change - it's just a platform-level thing that makes it look > > in two locations: the arch-independent and the arch-specific. > > I am just wondering whether the update manager breakage signals an > actual problem with certain features/plugins, or if it can be safely > ignored. Without 100% certainty, I'm pretty sure it can be safely ignored. I would say this is something we need to investigate but I'm focusing my time on the future update manager and integration with yum, etc. I'm going to send a note regarding that work today or tomorrow. Andrew
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-java-list mailing list fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list
