>>>>> "Tom" == Thomas Fitzsimmons <fitzsim@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: Tom> But instead of keeping gjdoc, I'd prefer to see sinjdoc's output Tom> improved to match gjdoc's, and highlighted source code linking support Tom> added to it, in the interests of limiting maintenance overhead (plus Tom> it's simpler to point people at one free javadoc solution). I think that the real issue isn't what we do in Fedora, but that gjdoc is more or less unmaintained upstream. So, while we were upgrading the whole toolchain to deal with Java 5, gjdoc got left behind. Then we had to find the cheapest way to pick up the pieces ... not very fun and not the best results :( Longer term I suppose OpenJDK will be opening their javadoc "soon". Tom -- fedora-devel-java-list mailing list fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list
