Mark Wielaard writes: > I am happy to see sinjdoc in Fedora rawhide. And I used that package to > create a generic version of the classpath docs: > http://developer.classpath.org/sinjdoc/ > But as you can see it is not as nicely looking (imho of course) as the > old gjdoc version: http://developer.classpath.org/doc/ > Also it doesn't seem to do highlighted source code linking, a feature I > really like in gjdoc. > > So for non-generic/1.5 code I would like to have gjdoc still around, but > is seems sinjdoc actually replaces gjdoc. Does it have to? I think so. If I didn't like the look of sinjdoc ouput I'd write a patch for it. Andrew. -- Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, UK Registered in England and Wales No. 3798903 -- fedora-devel-java-list mailing list fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list
