David Walluck writes: > > Yes, we can find examples where jars are actually arch-dependent. Come > on, they are bundling binary code, so of course they are. > > That doesn't mean that they aren't completely wrong in doing so. That's really not at issue here. We're talking about where to put the jars from upstream packages, not whether the upstream maintainers are right. Andrew. -- fedora-devel-java-list mailing list fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list
