On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 10:14 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote: > And a slight problem with the alternative libraries is that at least for > GPl applications xerces and/or xalan come under an incompatible license > (GPLv3 will be compatible, but no applications use that yet). But we can > try to make only non-GPL works based on these libraries use them I > guess. +1 That would be great if you all have reasons for getting xerces/xalan in Fedora. We were going to ask for it anyway for the Fedora DocBook toolchain. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, RHCE, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41 ////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-java-list mailing list fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list