Andrew Overholt wrote: > Hi, > > jython > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898 > This has already been approved but we need to investigate the inclusion > of python 2.2. Is it just a BR? If not, I'm concerned about shipping > another python version in the distro. We're also not sure if it's > completely necessary ... supposedly batik needs it but we're hoping we > can avoid that dependency. > This is probably useful: http://dev.gentoo.org/~betelgeuse/jython-reverse-deps.txt Regards, Petteri
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-devel-java-list mailing list fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list
