Hi Tom, On Fri, 2006-12-29 at 13:09 -0700, Tom Tromey wrote: > >>>>> "Mark" == Mark Wielaard <mark@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > Mark> - January 23 - Test1 Development Freeze > > Ok... > > Mark> - 1.5 language & library support in gcj > Mark> This seems to be the biggest and most intrusive upgrade. But starting > Mark> this early seems like a very good idea. Upstream is cleaning up some > Mark> last issues. And it needs lots of testing. Would be good if something > Mark> can be cooked up for Test1. Needs help from gcc-toolchain people. > > Yeah... do we know what base compiler is being used for FC7? > We'll probably have to back-port all the 1.5 stuff to that. > Kinda tough before the 23rd considering that we haven't merged it all > to GCC mainline yet :( I have CCed Jakub. If there is a fedora branch in gcc svn then maybe porting/patching can be done at the same time as it lands on mainline? > Mark> - Separate libgcj-rpm. > > This is suspended pending the core/extras merge. O, that is a pity. Any idea what/how long that will take? > Mark> - java-gcj-compat > Mark> (Do we also need updates for javap and javah replacements?) > > We don't have javap at all, do we? But we do have jcf-dump, which has > not changed during all the 1.5 work. You are right. Strange, since jcf-dump has a --javap mode I assumed it would be the natural wrapper for java-gcj-compat to provide javap. > The new javah that is in Classpath will show up when we merge the > gcj-eclipse branch to trunk. Will this replace gcjh? Cheers, Mark -- fedora-devel-java-list mailing list fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list
