Hi, On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 11:40 -0500, Andrew Overholt wrote: > On Wed, 2006-29-11 at 08:28 -0800, Anthony Green wrote: > > On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 18:57 -0600, Phil Muldoon wrote: > > > Is > > > there a Wiki page, guide .. or general advice to accomplish this as it > > > is done via the Classpath rpm? > > > > I was under the impression that Eclipse finds the target JDK's src.zip > > based on well known conventions of JDK layout (which we follow in > > java-1.4.2-gcj-compat). As far as I know there's no way to do this for > > random jar files. You need to manually attach the source jar/zip to the > > jar file within Eclipse. > > No, I think it can be done for any jar. Ben will know, though. Not automatically as far as I can tell. Yes, the Java-GNOME jars have a source zips but you have to manually add them. I asked about this when 3.0 came out but didn't hear anything and I briefly looked into to yesterday, but came up with nothing again. I don't have time to investigate it fully, so I think I'll just file a bug see what they say. > > Perhaps it makes sense to add a manifest file tag identifying the > > location of the jar file's source code. Then Eclipse could be taught to > > look for the source itself. Maybe this is something Andrew and team can > > tackle as part of their new Eclipse Linux packaging effort at > > eclipse.org. Yeah, that a good idea and I've wanted this for a while. I was thinking of checking a known location, for example if you add package-version.jar, it would auto-attach package-version-src.zip. This seems to be a convention that eclipse uses. But using a manifest file tag would be more robust. Perhaps supporting both would be a good idea using the manifest as the preferred source. The only concern I have heard about providing these zips on a large scale is that the source code is already provided in the debuginfo packages so making the source zips puts the source code in two places. However, there are a couple of issues with using the debuginfo packages like this: 1) AFAIK not all mirrors carry the debuginfo packages and they're not enabled by default which means it's hard to rely on them 3) debuginfo generation of Eclipse and I think other java packages is broken ATM As far as doing the work, I personally don't have the time to do it, but I'll make sure it gets on a general tasks list on the Eclipse Linux packaging wiki. HTH, Ben -- fedora-devel-java-list mailing list fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list