On Sun, 2006-08-27 at 15:02 -0600, Tom Tromey wrote: > One way to check is to run gij with -verbose:class and look at the > output. It will tell you which classes are defined "BC-compiled", > which are interpreted, etc. This output looks very suspicious to me: [Loaded (bytecode) org.bouncycastle.jce.provider.BouncyCastleProvider from (file:/usr/share/java/gcj-endorsed/bcprov-1.33.ja\r <no certificates>)] [Loaded (BC-compiled) org.bouncycastle.asn1.pkcs.PKCSObjectIdentifiers from (file:/usr/share/java/gcj-endorsed/bcprov-1.33.j\ar <no certificates>)] [Loaded (BC-compiled) org.bouncycastle.asn1.DERObjectIdentifier from (file:/usr/share/java/gcj-endorsed/bcprov-1.33.jar <no \certificates>)] [Loaded (BC-compiled) org.bouncycastle.asn1.DERObject from (file:/usr/share/java/gcj-endorsed/bcprov-1.33.jar <no certificat\es>)] [Loaded (BC-compiled) org.bouncycastle.asn1.ASN1Encodable from (file:/usr/share/java/gcj-endorsed/bcprov-1.33.jar <no certif\icates>)] [Loaded (pre-compiled) org.bouncycastle.asn1.DEREncodable from (file:/usr/share/java/gcj-endorsed/bcprov-1.33.jar <no certif\icates>)] [Loaded (pre-compiled) org.bouncycastle.asn1.DERTags from (file:/usr/share/java/gcj-endorsed/bcprov-1.33.jar <no certificate\s>)] This is all from the same .jar that was built to a .so using our standard mechanism. Similarly, it looks as though some Azureus and SWT classes are "BC-compiled" and some are "bytecode". BTW, I also noticed in an ant run that ant was executing natively, while the Eclipse compiler it invokes is being interpreted. Builds are noticeable slower than on my FC5 machine. > I don't think there is a super-easy way to check the contents of a > .jar against a given .db -- but you could make a new .db using the SWT > .jar, then dump both the installed .db and the new one, and compare > class signatures using a script. Maybe the installed .db is corrupted > or made from an old SWT or something. Gah.. this is the problem. Somewhere along the line aot-compile-rpm is creating partial classmap.db files. For instance, bcprov-1.33.jar.db only contains 331 entries but bcprov-1.33.jar has over 800 classes. I'll file a bug (against java-1.4.2-gcj-compat-devel I suppose) and copy relevant people. AG -- fedora-devel-java-list mailing list fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list
