Re: [fedora-java] decoupling libgcj from gcc.src.rpm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 10:52 -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
> The best scenario would be to fix CNI.  I'm kind of assuming we won't
> do that anytime soon though.

What would be needed to "fix CNI"?
Are there any drawbacks to fixing it?

Cheers,

Mark

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Index of Archives]     [Red Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux