-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Mark Wielaard wrote: > It would be nice if we can coordinate the patch-set between fedora and > debian. And maybe, if it all seems to work out find, we could even > suggest that patch-set for a new 4.1.x release. Even if that breaks > binary compatibility. Because if it is what the distributions ship then > it must be good :) I don't know how wise this is, and maybe upstream GCC cares about ABI compatibility, but I personally don't have a use for it. And I am sure that along with Debian and the JPackage conglomerate (Fedora, Mandriva, Red Hat, Suse, etc.) we probably could get everyone using it for their upcoming releases :) - -- Sincerely, David Walluck <david@xxxxxxxx> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mandriva - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEiLCmN5thZBYlTwkRAoi5AJ44rzoqbTZgibrPptSd6iVU/HXsnQCfaAok pIzoD0ay595jWpnmG1Ory8g= =/sSC -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
