On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 08:51 -0400, Robert Marcano wrote: > On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 02:15 -0400, Ben Konrath wrote: > > The source archive could also be a tar.gz or zip exported by > > eclipse at the same time the features/plugins are exported as a > > deployable plugin or feature. I'm going to write a little doc that > > explains how to do this so that we can get upstream people to do this in > > the future. One of the subclipse developers saw my previous post and > > said he would be interested in helping out. OK, here's the doc: http://people.redhat.com/bkonrath/eclipse/exporting-buildable-source-archives.html I just posted a message to the subclipse list asking them to provide a proper source archive and I talked to a phpeclipse developer on irc today who said that he would provide a source archive too. > > I updated the subclipse and svn-client-adapter rpms that you posted and > > and changed a few things: > > > > http://people.redhat.com/bkonrath/eclipse/ > > > > I may have been a little aggressive with the changes, so feel free to > > slap me if you don't like anything or if anything is incorrect :) > > no slap for you... the changes are for a better spec file Phew :) One thing I forgot was to put a 'Provides eclipse-svn'. Do you think this is a good idea? > ummm interesting, when subversion-javahl is not installed > SVNClientAdapter reverts to use the JavaSVN version. I think that a > little patch to disable and remove the svnjavahl.jar jar file insode the > plugin can do the trick too Yeah that would work and it's probably a little better if we're trying to get this into Extras. BTW, can you put me in the CC field of the package review request once it gets going? Thanks. > > Robert, once we put the generic releng scripts in the SDK rpm, would you > > be interested in being the subclipse rpm maintainer? > > Sure... I will try this changes, complete the TODOs and then submit it > to extras Ok, I'll put this package-build stuff into the main SDK and update the Eclipse in FC5. Ben
