Gary Benson writes: > Andrew Haley wrote: > > Andrew Overholt writes: > > > So with a simple test.xml [2], we get: > > > > > > [echo] java.version is 1.5 > > > > > > Is there a way we can get around this without patching ant or > > > removing the 1.5 class library stuff from libgcj? > > > > Suggest we patch ant to use System.getProperty("java.version") > > and push that patch upstream. > > Presumably there's a reason they don't already do this. I looked at the history of that file, and they have never done this. There's no explanation as to why. Andrew.