Hi Karsten, On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 17:45 -0800, Karsten Wade wrote: > Just a follow-up, thanks for the update. If there is anything that > Fedora Documentation Project folks can do to help ... and we'll be > testing Saxon and FOP as soon as the packages are in Extras, so you have > that help ... just let myself, Tommy Reynolds > <Tommy.Reynolds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, and/or fedora-docs-list. I believe in this case the problem is well understood. But if anybody that has some application that doesn't work (completely) on the free stack using gcj at this time attends Fosdem next week (February 25 and 26) in Brussels please stop by in the "GNU Classpath & Friends" room: http://www.fosdem.org/2006/index/dev_room_classpath/ http://developer.classpath.org/mediation/Fosdem2006 We have a "Show your App/Hack your App" session that would be a great time to sit down and get things integrated/fixed. Sometimes the gcj/classpath hackers don't know which programs/libraries are out there and/or how they fit together and sometimes the packagers/users don't know which compiler/library/runtimes tricks can be used to get things working. It also help us set priorities for things to work on. Knowing there are eager users to try out your stuff is always encouraging! :) Cheers, Mark
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
