Tom Tromey writes: > >>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > >> This patch to libgcj would let us resurrect the LD_PRELOAD hack. The > >> idea is to remove the "pr13212.so" entry from LD_PRELOAD during libgcj > >> startup, to avoid passing this to sub-processes which may not be > >> prepared for it. > > Andrew> So no process ever inherits the LD_PRELOAD unless it uses > Andrew> libgcj? Sounds right. > > The way it works is the 'java' wrapper sets LD_PRELOAD, and libgcj > removes this entry. So, only things invoked via 'java' will get the > preload. > > If that still sounds ok to you I'll send the patch to Jakub for > inclusion in the RPM (or on the RH branch, whatever). OK. I believe that will work for every case I know. Andrew.