Jakub Jelinek writes: > On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 04:34:33PM +0000, Andrew Haley wrote: > > Looking further, I realize that my analysis is quite wrong. The "push > > %eax" is promptly followed by "pop %ebx", so a CFA offset of 12 is > > correct. D'oh! > > > > This is what comes of doing my thinking in public... Still, I have > > discovered this problem is tune=i386 specific. I'll continue looking. > > > > > > 00a326a8 <java.lang.Throwable.Throwable(java.lang.String)>: > > a326a8: 56 push %esi > > a326a9: 53 push %ebx > > a326aa: 50 push %eax > > a326ab: e8 00 00 00 00 call a326b0 <java.lang.Throwable.Throwable(java.lang.String)+0x8> > > a326b0: 5b pop %ebx > > Well, call here does the push and pop %ebx pops it. So this sequence > still decreases %esp by 12 bytes. Yeah -- I was right first time. I think I'm going to keep quiet 'til I've solved the problem! :-) Andrew.
