Andrew Haley wrote: > Gary Benson writes: > > Andrew Haley wrote: > > > It will be invoked from the specfile, but by either > > > > > > a. Going to some java dir and running make, or > > > b. Running some VM-agnostic script that does a. > > > > > > That way, should there ever be some other VM that does > > > precompilation, we need only to add a make rule for whatever it > > > needs. > > > > Ok. FWIW I perfer B, but it's really something for JPackage not > > Fedora to decide. As long as Fedora rpms can continue to call > > 'rebuild-gcj-db' or 'gcj-dbtool --rebuild' until JPackage figure > > out what they're doing then that's fine. > > Well, OK: I don't mind. Going through every RPM changing > "rebuild-gcj-db" to "gcj-dbtool --rebuild" and then changing it > again some time in the future sounds like a PITA to me ... but > then I won't be doing it! It'd probably be best to leave them calling "rebuild-gcj-db" for now, since we won't be able to get rid of /usr/bin/rebuild-gcj-db until we stop caring about people upgrading from FC4. Cheers, Gary
