Hi, On Thu, 2005-08-04 at 09:45 -0400, David Walluck wrote: > Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > It's very possible the ldap is only there for compliance with some spec, > > and tomcat code has no use for it. > > I mean, ldapjdk does not provide javax.naming.*, and I don't think that the > jndi-ldap virtual package was meant for service providers (or was it?), in > which case java-gcj-compat should provide jndi-ldap since it has > javax.naming.*. > > And tomcat5 does require those classes to build. javax.naming.* and subpackages should be provided by libgcj/classpath. We were up to date till at least 1.3, but maybe some newer classes are missing. Could you post any compile errors and/or post a bug report containing these to http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath/bugs.html Thanks, Mark -- Escape the Java Trap with GNU Classpath! http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html Join the community at http://planet.classpath.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
