David Walluck wrote: > As for the ldapjdk javadocs, if you are planning on keeping ldapjdk > in FC, then I suggest you run the build again to make sure it's > still building (or it does build and I just have bad luck). I'll kill it if nobody objects. There's far more important things that need fixing. > > > When the tomcat5 build fails it is at line 315 (after patching) > > > of the jakarta-tomcat-5 build.xml which runs jasper2 on the jsp > > > examples. When the build terminates, generated_web.xml is empty. > > > > I've been getting this error too, I think, but it's a way down my > > todo list. I'll have a look at it now. > > If this error has been there, then how was it built in the first > place? I guess something regressed in libgcj, gcc-java, eclipse-ecj, or any of their or tomcat5's dependencies. Or it could be an early resolution issue or something similar that appeared because a class that wasn't native now is. I can't reproduce it locally, so it's not straightforward to fix. > Has FC4 gone through a rebuild process at all? I feel like some > packages may have been bootstrapped in or gotten in at one time > when they worked and then stopped working at a later date. I'm not sure if Fedora has mass-rebuilds these days. Certainly we used to do it, but even so it'd only catch regressions once per cycle. > If I am the only one getting this error, I don't know enough about > jasper (or whatever) right now to investigate. Bugzilla the details and I'll help you out. Cheers, Gary