On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 14:58 -0700, Anthony Green wrote: > On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 17:38 -0400, Andrew Overholt wrote: > > * Anthony Green <green@xxxxxxxxxx> [2005-07-05 17:24]: > > > On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 16:57 -0400, Andrew Overholt wrote: > > > > > I look into submitting it to extras. [...] > > > > On second thought, should we ship this or classpath-javadoc? > > Why would it make sense to ship classpath javadoc? We don't ship > classpath. For the record. Whether you use libgcj, kaffe or classpath as core class libraries in principle the documentation generated by gjdoc should be the same for all three. Since they all are build from GNU Classpath sources. Modulo small bug fixes/not yet merged documentation updates of course. Cheers, Mark
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
