On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 17:59 -0400, Andrew Overholt wrote: > * Anthony Green <green@xxxxxxxxxx> [2005-07-05 17:58]: > > On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 17:38 -0400, Andrew Overholt wrote: > > > * Anthony Green <green@xxxxxxxxxx> [2005-07-05 17:24]: > > > > On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 16:57 -0400, Andrew Overholt wrote: > > > > > > I look into submitting it to extras. [...] > > > > > > On second thought, should we ship this or classpath-javadoc? > > > > Why would it make sense to ship classpath javadoc? We don't ship > > classpath. > > I know. I think this should go into the gcc RPM and not as a standalone > package. Oh, right - I agree. I wrote this package after we started hearing about the FC4 size problems. I would have submitted a GCC spec file patch to Jakub otherwise. AG
