Andrew Overholt wrote:
* Ian Pilcher <i.pilcher@xxxxxxxxxxx> [2005-07-05 17:16]:
I'd argue that it should be in Core (and that it should be built as
part of the libgcj SRPM). I'd also suggest having a
java-1.4.2-gcj-compat-doc RPM which creates appropriate symlinks in
/usr/share/javadoc. (See my other note about the ownership of
/usr/share/javadoc/java.)
I agree.
FYI - I've put an RFE in bugzilla:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=162534
It's under GCC, since that's where libgcj comes from. Interested
parties on the Java side of things may want to add themselves to the cc
list.
On second thought, I believe that the "compatibility" package should
probably be named classpath-javadoc-libgcj-compat, since it will provide
compatibility with JPackage's classpath-javadoc.
Thanks!
--
========================================================================
Ian Pilcher i.pilcher@xxxxxxxxxxx
========================================================================
