On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 11:08 -0600, Tom Tromey wrote: > Andrew> Personally, I would rank 1.5 language support over > Andrew> gcjwebplugin. > > Why is that? > > My reason for prioritizing the plugin is that it enables useful > end-user functionality (and also would make JNLP work, though that is > not as cool). Also I haven't seen a huge amount of 1.5 code in the > wild, so delaying this a little seemed like it wouldn't hurt much. I have to agree with Andrew here. Significant Eclipse plugins are now being written using 1.5 code. If we want to continue supporting Eclipse, we'll need to be compliant here. Best regards, Dave Orme -- Visual Editor Project lead http://www.db4o.com -- The Open-source Java Object Database http://xswt.sf.net -- XML-based SWT page description language
