On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 01:24 -0400, Thomas Fitzsimmons wrote:
>
> I think we should rename it libgcj-jawt.so. libjawt-using apps will
> look for $JAVA_HOME/jre/lib/i386/libjawt.so which we already have a
> symlink for in java-gcj-compat.
Tom - this doesn't quite work as implemented.
It turns out that jogl does a System.loadLibrary("jawt") which fails
since we renamed the library.
I'm not sure what the best solution is.
If we make libjawt.so an alternative, then it will mess up running non-
alternative java programs. Maybe we should have stowed it away in a
libgcj specific directory instead of renaming it.
AG
