On Mar 10 mai 2005 16:33, Gary Benson a écrit : > Nicolas Mailhot wrote: >> If a package is present in jpackage.org but is slightly different in >> Fedora Extras that usualy means it had to include some gcj-specific >> changes. > > Actually, for s/Fedora Extras/Fedora Core/ this is not strictly true. > Firstly, many of the packages have had their non-free dependencies > slashed out. This doesn't mean they don't _work_ on gcj, it just > means we're not using them for moral reasons. Well when I wrote gcj-specific I meant gcj+gnu classpath specific problems;) Obviously if the harmony guys want a full j2ee replacement they'll have to take care of all those non-free dependency holes too. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot
