On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 15:51 +0000, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Andrew Overholt writes:
> >
> > I decided to do something similar to what Ziga had done. I took his
> > HelloWorld.java [1] and compiled it with three incarnations of ecj:
>
> Isn't this program to small to be a reasonable test?
Andrew, if you want to repeat the tests for GNU Classpath, here's what I
did:
1. grab a classpath snapshot (or checkout from CVS)
2. ./configure --with-ecj
3. apply the attached patch to work around an ecj bug[1]
4. link /usr/bin/ecj to one of your incarnations
5. cd lib; time make
6. make clean, rinse, repeat
If I understand correctly, any significant difference in these timings
would indicate BC-ABI performance penalty?
[1] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=88562
--
Ziga
Index: gnu/java/awt/peer/gtk/GdkGraphics2D.java
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/classpath/classpath/gnu/java/awt/peer/gtk/GdkGraphics2D.java,v
retrieving revision 1.33
diff -u -r1.33 GdkGraphics2D.java
--- gnu/java/awt/peer/gtk/GdkGraphics2D.java 16 Feb 2005 13:59:03 -0000 1.33
+++ gnu/java/awt/peer/gtk/GdkGraphics2D.java 24 Mar 2005 16:02:19 -0000
@@ -99,9 +99,9 @@
static
{
- if (! Configuration.GTK_CAIRO_ENABLED)
- throw new Error("Grahics2D not implemented. "
- + "Cairo was not found or disabled at configure time");
+ //if (! Configuration.GTK_CAIRO_ENABLED)
+ // throw new Error("Grahics2D not implemented. "
+ // + "Cairo was not found or disabled at configure time");
if (Configuration.INIT_LOAD_LIBRARY)
System.loadLibrary("gtkpeer");
