On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 18:31 +0000, Andrew Haley wrote: >Tom Tromey writes: > > >>>>> "Joe" == Joe Orton <jorton@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > >> gcj bug: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20294 > > > > Joe> So do I need to file a bug on this issue in Red Hat bugzilla or are is > > Joe> this "in progress"? I can't enable the Subversion javahl bindings until > > Joe> this is fixed. > > > > Andrew Haley has a list of "gcc bugs we would like fixed in gcc > > 4.0". I forwarded this to him. He's going to try to get a gcc > > hacker at RH to fix these (though I don't actually know what > > criteria he's using to decide what to ask for...). > >At the moment, my criterion is "kills a significant number of gcj apps >or renders some other feature, such as debugging, useless." > You may want to add this one, since it prevents building eclipse on ia64: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20294 Tom
