On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 22:24 +0100, Ziga Mahkovec wrote: >On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 11:38 -0500, Thomas Fitzsimmons wrote: >> On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 15:04 +0000, Andrew Haley wrote: >> >I see. Of course, I have no idea why tools.jar is attempting to use >> >the gcjlib:// class loader, or why it is so slow when it does. It >> >really should not explicitly use this class loader. >> >> I doesn't any more. We were doing that to avoid having to always add >> jdtcore.jar to the classpath. I also have no idea why it's so slow but >> I did notice a significant performance hit when compared to interpreted >> mode. >> >> Ziga, you can get the sources for java-gcj-compat from >> sources.redhat.com: > >Ah, much better, thanks. Here are the revised times (BTW, that's a >1.5GHz Pentium M): > >HelloWorld > >ecj | ecj-native | jikes >------------------------------------------------------------- >real 0m1.863s | real 0m1.614s | real 0m0.067s >user 0m1.758s | user 0m1.536s | user 0m0.050s >sys 0m0.103s | sys 0m0.076s | sys 0m0.012s > > >GNU Classpath (cd lib; make) > >ecj | ecj-native | jikes >------------------------------------------------------------- >real 1m24.539s | real 0m24.552s | real 0m9.439s >user 1m23.157s | user 0m23.047s | user 0m7.486s >sys 0m1.142s | sys 0m1.139s | sys 0m0.771s > > What release of eclipse-ecj are you using? Just recently we were able to build Eclipse with -O2 on x86. I'm not sure if the new packages have hit rawhide yet. Tom
