On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 15:22 -0600, Phil Muldoon wrote: > Ok, just to make sure we are on the same track here. There are two > definitions of native code when we talk about releng plugin stuff. Are > you talking about when the project itself has to generate native code > (like the CDT does for some bits, like the linux/win32/solaris etc > fragments), which we have to do in the SPEC files manually (instead of > using the packaged prebuilt .so's). > > Or the second definition, where we compile all the produced jars > to .so's with gcj in the spec file? > > I suspect you are talking about the first, (fwiw I think the second case > should always remain in the spec files). Yeah, your suspicion is correct, I was referring to the first case you listed. I agree that the gcj jar -> so compilation should remain in the spec file. Cheers, Ben
