Re: Fedora 27 Beta blocker status mail #1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 3:32 AM, Adam Williamson
<adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi folks! Time for an update on the Fedora 27 Beta status.
>
> tl;dr action summary
> ====================
>
> Accepted blockers
> -----------------
>
> 1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489164
> ACTION: QA to test and karma update:
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-fee0766883
> then check whether backgrounds are fixed for all blocking desktops
> after compose run with update included.
>
> 2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487867
> ACTION: QA to test and karma update:
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-a8b4e05ef3
>
> 3. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487305
> ACTION: kernel team to provide a suitable update, ARM QA to test it
>
> 4. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475570
> ACTION: anaconda and LVM folks to co-ordinate and provide a fix
>
> 5. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170803
> ACTION: QA to confirm this is fixed already
>
> 6. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1483170
> ACTION: lvrabec to fix remaining SELinux denials during FreeIPA
> deployment
>
> Proposed blockers
> -----------------
>
> 1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1490072
> ACTION: QA to test and see how commonly encountered, desktop team to fix
>
> 2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489862
> ACTION: QA to answer outstanding questions in bug
>
> Test coverage
> -------------
>
> QA to cover several missing tests (see below for details), stand by to
> test with new validation compose soon.
>
>
>
> Bug-by-bug detail
> =================
>
> Accepted blockers
> -----------------
>
> 1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489164 - distribution - NEW
>    Fedora 27 Beta backgrounds must be different from Fedora 26
>
> This is kind of a tracker for all the work that's needed to get the
> backgrounds updated in all blocking desktops. We now have the package
> reviewed and submitted as an update:
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-fee0766883
> with the desktop-backgrounds changes included, but there may be
> other changes needed also. So at the least we need karma for that
> update, then we need to figure out what else needs to change to ensure
> at least Xfce, GNOME and KDE have the updated backgrounds.
>
> 2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487867 - grub2 - ON_QA
>    Wrong version on legacy variant (e.g. grub2-pc) Obsoletes:
>
> This is the bug that causes upgrades to choke on grub2 package
> dependencies. An update is available and just needs testing and karma -
> you should be able to test just by verifying that the issues no longer
> appear if you try upgrading with the updates-testing repo enabled.
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-a8b4e05ef3
>
> 3. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487305 - kernel - MODIFIED
>    Raspberry Pi 3: run-initial-setup hangs
>
> Peter's done a build that ought to fix this, but not yet submitted an
> update - so we either need a new update created, or the existing update
> for kernel-4.13.0-1.fc27 edited to include the new build. Ideally we'd
> prefer a build with just what's in the frozen repos now plus the fix
> for this, but the 4.13.0-1.fc27 update has been in testing for a while
> and has +2 karma, so it probably works OK. However, there's another
> issue: both 4.13.0-1 and 4.13.1-301 were built with debugging enabled,
> and I think we usually ship Beta with debugging disabled. So we kinda
> need another build with debugging disabled, I think.

I think we usually leave debugging off once we branch letting rawhide
continue on down the debug route, must have slipped through the
cracks, have kicked off a 302 and will submit that as an update on
completion.

> 4. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475570 - lvm2 - NEW
>    Rescue mode fails while trying to access LVM volumes from existing install
>
> This is a failure of the installer's rescue mode when trying to mount
> LVM volumes from an existing Fedora install. There's no fix built yet,
> but there's some suggestion of a 'quick fix' that could be done on the
> anaconda side in the bug:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475570#c13
> We need someone to take charge of deciding how to fix this, and...fix
> it.
>
> 5. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170803 - python-blivet - ON_QA
>    calls e2fsck on all ext volumes, provides no status indicator, and hangs indefinitely if e2fsck doesn't exit
>
> This is almost certainly fixed, we just need someone to test and
> confirm with a system where the effect is obvious. The fix has actually
> broken filesystem resizing in most cases, but that technically blocks
> Final rather than Beta.
>
> 6. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1483170 - selinux-policy-targeted - MODIFIED
>    'map' denial for comm 'ns-slapd' path '/run/dirsrv/slapd-DOMAIN-LOCAL.stats' (breaks FreeIPA deployment)
>
> The specific denial initially reported here is fixed, but there are
> still denials preventing FreeIPA server deployment working with the
> latest selinux-policy that has reached stable (-280), so we need
> Lukas to fix those. I have listed the remaining denials in this bug
> and in #1488404.
>
>
> Proposed blockers
> -----------------
>
> 1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1490072 - gnome-shell - ASSIGNED
>    Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. #0 0x00007f16279aa68f in _cogl_boxed_value_set_x () ...
>
> This is a crash in mutter which seems quite easy to trigger by running
> VMs in virt-manager and Boxes. There's an Ubuntu bug which reports
> the same crash triggered by some sort of Ubuntu update tool as well.
> I have reproduced this on two boxes and there are at least three other
> reporters across this bug, an upstream GNOME bug and a Launchpad bug,
> so it seems fairly easy to hit. It would be useful if other folks
> running GNOME on Wayland in F27 could test launching VMs in Boxes and/or
> virt-manager and confirm whether doing this sometimes crashes their
> GNOME session. Of course, we could also do with the GNOME folks
> figuring out a fix.
>
> 2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489862 - selinux-policy - ON_QA
>    There is FW Raid set, but there is no /dev/md* device
>
> There are some questions in the bug that need answering: does this work
> OK if using a network or DVD install image? Does it work OK if booting
> a live image with enforcing=0 ? You need an Intel firmware RAID set
> (that's known to basically work with previous Fedora releases) to test
> this.
>
>
> Test coverage
> -------------
>
> Looking at https://www.happyassassin.net/testcase_stats/27/ ,
> some things jump out...
>
> * The Cloud tests appear never to have been run during this cycle.
> * Most of the Beta desktop tests have never been run on KDE during this cycle.
> * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_workstation_core_applications has never been run during this cycle.
> * Our old friend https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_install_to_SAS still isn't sorted out.
> * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_User_Interface_Basic_Video_Driver has never been run during this cycle.
> * Neither has https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Kickstart_File_Path_Ks_Cfg .
> * Many upgrade tests have no results, this is because they constantly fail in
>   openQA, but not necessarily for release blocking reasons; I will look into
>   that and update.
> * The tests for reporting crashes from anaconda haven't been run at all:
>   https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_save_traceback_to_bugzilla
> * Server test coverage looks bad, but this is mainly because openQA doesn't
>   report failures and FreeIPA has been broken for the entire F27 cycle.
>   With a couple more SELinux fixes most of those tests should show up
>   as passing. We do still need the AD tests run, though.
> --
> Adam Williamson
> Fedora QA Community Monkey
> IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
> http://www.happyassassin.net
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list -- cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux