[atomic-wg] Issue #281: Figure out comprehensive strategy for atomic host container storage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



vgoyal added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
So this relies on that fact that atomic users will not use devicemapper graph driver. If they really need to use devicemapper, they will need to add additional disk. (Which requires extra effort and planning). 

So has this been established that overlayfs is working well for container workload and most of the users don't have the need to go back to devicemapper.

In F26, we wanted to retain capability to easily go back to devicemapper if things don't work out well with overlayfs. Given F26 is not GA, I guess we don't even have that data to make a decision?
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/281
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list -- cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux