On Fri, Apr 21, 2017, at 10:16 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > NOTE: if you respond to this message please 'reply-all'. > > I'd like to discuss firewalld on atomic host. I think there here are two cases: AH-as-Kube/OpenShift host: In this I'd turn the conversation around - do Kube/OpenShift want to depend on firewalld? This has come up before, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403331 Standalone/"pet" AH: I think that package layering solves this today (and other "pet" cases), and ideally we would also provide a container. Basically I don't have a definitive answer myself, but hopefully at least the above bz link is useful. _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list -- cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
