On Tue, 2016-12-06 at 17:01 -0500, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > On 12/06/2016 04:38 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > > I think we had general agreement around what we want to do here: > > have the Cloud Base Image become instead Fedora Server, but shipped > > as a cloud image and made available in cloud providers. What are > > the > > next steps to actually get there? > > > We discussed this and I believe the path forward is to have the Cloud > base image "housed" under the server WG. My understanding is that it > will take on a similar form to what it has now until we more hammer > our what "base runtime" is and then we'll add on top of base runtime > just what we need to satisfy cloud environments. > > I have been identified as a stakeholder of this image and have an > action item to deliver some paragraph that indicates such to > sgallagh. > > Dusty Contact Releng to coordinate the logistics of such a change Dennis
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ cloud mailing list -- cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
